From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EJkQ7-00084x-5d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 04:16:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8Q49OZX000622; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 04:09:24 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8Q47kuV029467 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 04:07:46 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EJkNt-0005ku-66 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 04:14:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 32433 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2005 00:11:58 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 26 Sep 2005 00:11:58 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 00:15:10 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <1126897217.7832.49.camel@Memoria.anyarch.net> <20050918124024.GB7222@pluto.atHome> <433772B5.9050909@leetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <433772B5.9050909@leetworks.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509260015.10267.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 0a1f4321-434e-4aae-baf0-5db6b9edc88c X-Archives-Hash: ea2bb6ea50df52bc8fc5073ea8904b03 On Monday 26 September 2005 12:01 am, Andrew Muraco wrote: > 1) would ?arch become the old ~arch, if it was implemented? > 2) would people actually try to run a full ?arch system? > 3) #2, would it be possible without breakage? if we went with a testing mask it'd mean that users would be forced to select individual testing packages ... they wouldnt be able to globally accept all testing packages this is another advantage of going with a testing.mask instead of a ?arch system -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list