From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIpB1-0005hv-N3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:09:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8NF25tX026395; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:02:05 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8NExe5p030655 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:59:40 GMT Received: from zh034158.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([222.3.34.158] helo=opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EIp7f-0004sX-Fo for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:05:59 +0000 Received: by opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E5219104283; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 00:06:03 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] "Commercial" software in portage Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 00:06:01 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.91 References: <20050921172801.42BBEF5C20@mail.deploylinux.net> <43326AAB.2050309@gentoo.org> <20050923144251.GC18375@nightcrawler> In-Reply-To: <20050923144251.GC18375@nightcrawler> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart34172099.spDVRClSmn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200509240006.03727.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 19b95654-fafe-4672-b4b4-6f440f63e67f X-Archives-Hash: abbc801abba469d5a152254376deaa86 --nextPart34172099.spDVRClSmn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 23 September 2005 23:42, Brian Harring wrote: > GLEP23's accept_license is (for me) the preferred solution; you have > everything locally, the choice of what you use is yours (rather then a > default upstream with a secondary repo of commercial). It doesn't fully cover what's being discussed here. $ grep LICENSE doom3-1.3.1302.ebuild LICENSE=3D"DOOM3" $ grep LICENSE doom3-demo-1.1.1286.ebuild LICENSE=3D"DOOM3" The first is what's under discussion. The second isn't. =2D-=20 Jason Stubbs --nextPart34172099.spDVRClSmn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDNBnbxvWNPsk/ZP4RAmljAJ9d2pp+wmU7MTpr7O/PxNmc013ilgCgn86c thzUsaC4tXw2gMPOJAsxnHg= =Ei4F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart34172099.spDVRClSmn-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list