From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIrW4-0003it-6W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:39:20 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8NHUcwR017127; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:30:38 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8NHSZmf030575 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:28:36 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIrRo-0002h0-5m for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:34:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 13177 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2005 13:33:08 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 23 Sep 2005 13:33:08 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux Standard Base Project Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:35:23 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <43342BD3.8000004@quanteam.info> In-Reply-To: <43342BD3.8000004@quanteam.info> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509231335.23641.vapier@gentoo.org> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j8NHSZmf030575 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j8NHUc03017127 X-Archives-Salt: a7a38eb1-52d6-4fae-bb81-f77c3fcad59b X-Archives-Hash: 97e9486fdf29aada70a6af8b4acf4013 On Friday 23 September 2005 12:22 pm, Pawe=B3 Madej wrote: > I've found a news that LSB Release3 [1] was announced. So there is my > question. Are Gentoo Foundation and Gentoo Developers developing Gentoo > Linux in coordinance with standards provided by this specification? this has come up before on gentoo-dev (was a while back though, dunno if=20 gmane.org would have it in its archives) ... we have very little interest in the LSB thus there are no plans at all to= =20 support it we do aim for FHS compliance when it isnt out of our way -mike --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list