From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIUfV-0004Kj-Ae for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:15:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8MH8gPE018144; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:08:43 GMT Received: from server8324611272.serverpool.info (unimatrix-01.org [83.246.112.72]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8MH71uN009717 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:07:01 GMT Received: (qmail 9098 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2005 17:13:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pluto.atHome) (kabel@cat0.de@cat0.de@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Sep 2005 17:13:12 -0000 Received: by pluto.atHome (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:13:04 +0200 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:13:04 +0200 From: Matti Bickel To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] "Commercial" software in portage Message-ID: <20050922171304.GA13650@pluto.atHome> References: <1127310677.30787.28.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050922003142.015c0529@sven.genone.homeip.net> <1127395734.24269.28.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050922153702.GA8801@lion.gg3.net> <1127404465.24269.54.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050922165604.GA9828@toucan.gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050922165604.GA9828@toucan.gentoo.org> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel (Linux) X-Archives-Salt: 3f63bf54-3308-4501-b902-5a2776d0877d X-Archives-Hash: cd4f6795303e0a9d94714574389a4510 --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cory Visi wrote: > I think this is a good idea. We just need to call it something that=20 > doesn't cause endless confusion. Sticking something like a "non-complete version" sticker on it would help. > On a related note, keeping with the philosophy here, I would say that=20 > Opera does not qualify for this new flag, because it works out of the=20 > box. Even if it has ads, it still works. However, Opera is obviously=20 > commercial, so this is another reason to perhaps think up another name=20 > for the flag. Opera is now ad-free. And while still not open-source, it's now both free (of charge) and free (of ads) Matti --=20 --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDMuYgfNMcoUhJ7GwRAkapAJ4ogbwiVNlXQLdW+35jBRFcz5F/LACgh/RY qapGr9J7dhYtpc3IXqKtayM= =YwkI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list