From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIG5U-0001fD-7g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 01:41:24 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8M1YGlp008507; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 01:34:16 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8M1VUEQ010367 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 01:31:31 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIG1m-0008La-CO for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 01:37:34 +0000 Received: (qmail 23079 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2005 11:49:51 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 21 Sep 2005 11:49:51 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-info.eclass and $CONFIG_CHECK Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:51:18 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050921074249.GA22507@ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp> <1127312529.30787.34.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050921143309.GA25602@dmz.fungus> In-Reply-To: <20050921143309.GA25602@dmz.fungus> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509211151.18352.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 4548ce8a-5463-46a1-97df-a4a7a8b9f2e0 X-Archives-Hash: 31bbe4815e10f8fab796b51a4c773492 On Wednesday 21 September 2005 10:33 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > What about the other issue which was brought up? Ebuilds enheriting > linux-info.eclass requires a configured kernel source? Personally, I > don't see anything wrong with that, if the above solution is > implemented (non-fatal checks remain non-fatal). Releng, > cross-compilers - what are your thoughts on this? it's just as easy to configure a kernel for another architecture as it is for a native one (assuming you got the hard part of generating a cross-toolchain), so cross-compiling should be covered -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list