From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EHI3I-0003m3-BI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:35:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8J9Sq0k004446; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:28:52 GMT Received: from callisto.cs.kun.nl (callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8J9R6qt009614 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:27:06 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by callisto.cs.kun.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804962E80C4 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:32:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:32:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com> <20050916222658.1af4dbdc@snowdrop.home> <200509161751.52295.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200509161751.52295.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2281128.aWkMrM4tQz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200509191132.38589.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: cb0bceef-7baa-4387-b423-3591913b9ee1 X-Archives-Hash: 59eb604571d9c6d4676ec923a6ad69f2 --nextPart2281128.aWkMrM4tQz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 16 September 2005 23:51, Mike Frysinger wrote: > that's the problem, there's no way to flag which packages should be > consulted and which ones are a non-issue This indeed kind of sums up my point. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart2281128.aWkMrM4tQz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDLoW2bKx5DBjWFdsRAuPpAKDWYXzS1+7HFKerqHzvEYJ8mjho0wCggFKy 1b2phMKP+2eIUhdouulbcgY= =QHIC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2281128.aWkMrM4tQz-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list