From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EGbxf-0002Lb-8u
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 12:38:31 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8HCW7Vx010230;
	Sat, 17 Sep 2005 12:32:07 GMT
Received: from himura.kakuri.org (minden014.server4you.de [217.172.177.14])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8HCTOon012170
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 12:29:24 GMT
Received: from localhost (dsl-082-082-206-192.arcor-ip.net [82.82.206.192])
	by himura.kakuri.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081EE79C029
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:34:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Christian Parpart <trapni@gentoo.org>
Organization: Gentoo Foundation
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] C++ herd proposal
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 15:27:46 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <200509171333.32265.trapni@gentoo.org> <TUSGQR.164679495ZTJLUW@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <TUSGQR.164679495ZTJLUW@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1371683.YmZ9snTN9o";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200509171527.49121.trapni@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 1efd1105-1e6d-4e1c-87ac-aabe3373e791
X-Archives-Hash: 2d22ff59ec5ca44100ab8770e92335dc

--nextPart1371683.YmZ9snTN9o
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 17 September 2005 14:01, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On 17/9/2005 13:33:30, Christian Parpart (trapni@gentoo.org) wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 September 2005 11:36, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > > On 17/9/2005 0:20:57, Mark Loeser (halcy0n@gentoo.org) wrote:
> > >
> > > C++ herd is a good idea, especially with that number of packages.
> > >
> > > >  I would also like to see many of them, if not all, moved to the
> > > > dev-cpp category:
> > >
> > > Is this bit really necessary?
> >
> > indeed, it at least helps curious c++ devs to browse through some yet
> > unknown c++ libs and he maybe finds something useful.
>
> If the only gain is that one group finds one search criteria a little
> easier, then I think that is far from sufficient reason to re-categorise.

errr... I didn't meant "of course" =3D=3D "indeed", I meant it a way of "th=
at=20
might make sense". sorry for the misunderstandings ;)

Regards,
Christian.

--nextPart1371683.YmZ9snTN9o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDLBnVPpa2GmDVhK0RAnXFAJ48/uXqdgP4HsZ5EIK05MB7WQFKWgCfSX3o
kUl+vxy3+/sjquCy/56X2cM=
=ohdy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1371683.YmZ9snTN9o--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list