From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGa9Q-0002L7-1C for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:42:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8HAa18J016473; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:36:01 GMT Received: from himura.kakuri.org (minden014.server4you.de [217.172.177.14]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8HAXbwe029224 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:33:37 GMT Received: from localhost (dsl-082-082-206-192.arcor-ip.net [82.82.206.192]) by himura.kakuri.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0458879C002 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 12:38:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Parpart Organization: Gentoo Foundation To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] C++ herd proposal Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 13:31:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <432B4549.1070400@gentoo.org> <200509161920.14823.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200509161920.14823.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5619007.b74KFjhBn7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200509171331.34960.trapni@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 88b18502-35e2-463f-9c6a-e69c77892d0b X-Archives-Hash: f018c81d26a5e1a746ddf900204a2f40 --nextPart5619007.b74KFjhBn7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 17 September 2005 01:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 16 September 2005 06:20 pm, Mark Loeser wrote: > > Since we currently have language herds for other languages such as Ada, > > Perl, and Java, I don't think C++ should be any different. > > it is different, but i dont mind the idea of having a bunch of C++ experts > looking over a bunch of packages which otherwise may be neglected And that's the point I see in as well - having some central point for our C= ++=20 experts/freaks. Of course, a c++ herd would not just be like ADA/Java IMO. Though, I vote FOR such a herd (and would like to join anyway) > > dev-libs/STLport (no-herd, vapier?) > > vapier/toolchain > > > dev-libs/fampp2 (no-herd, vapier) > > dev-libs/ferrisloki (no-herd, vapier) > > dev-libs/libferrisstreams (no-herd, vapier) > > dev-db/stldb4 > > generally i dont need help with these as the upstream author is a pretty > cool guy and gets back to me :) > -mike but having some backup is always the safer way, in case some of us is AFK f= or=20 some unobvious reasons and a security patch is to be injected. Regards, Christian Parpart --nextPart5619007.b74KFjhBn7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDK/6WPpa2GmDVhK0RAo4AAJ9rQz4+9uRxrBiOhZtFydWXL0xunwCfSnLC 7tZz7vCMNWlQt2wim1CNo6Y= =bQSc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5619007.b74KFjhBn7-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list