From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGNk9-0007I5-O3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:27:38 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8GLLQ2i005182; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:21:26 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8GLIY4i031295 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:18:34 GMT Received: from d180163.adsl.hansenet.de ([80.171.180.163] helo=iglu.bnet.local) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EGNgN-0002t6-4I for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:23:43 +0000 From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:23:35 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com> <200509162217.26369.carlo@gentoo.org> <20050916213838.1e7f65d7@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20050916213838.1e7f65d7@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3497302.9IPsijDTHk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200509162323.40674.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: c4925bf9-d2d6-45cf-ac90-acdeaf245070 X-Archives-Hash: 1dc54238405f574e3e50731e19a783ce --nextPart3497302.9IPsijDTHk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 16 September 2005 22:38, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > That's not my idea. That's policy. I just happen to a) have actually > read what policy says and b) agree with it. =46irst: I know you're proposing this regularly, but please show me the pol= icy -=20 I'm sure your interpretation doesn't match mine. Second: a) and b) doesn't match what's going on with large parts of the tre= e=20 and I refuse to constantly add and remove ebuilds from the package.mask fil= e,=20 that are not really broken. It's only extra work for me and confusing for=20 users. Carsten --nextPart3497302.9IPsijDTHk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDKzfcVwbzmvGLSW8RAj2fAKCBs8CEYEhLdOkbWMwUTbWuR9zEjgCfdeU8 vCMZr4bwhpQ/x5VTNJVO/uI= =Ozef -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3497302.9IPsijDTHk-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list