From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EGNls-0000wG-Ch
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:29:24 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8GLNYL7012886;
	Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:23:35 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8GLLGH8030053
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:21:16 GMT
Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EGNiw-0001li-JJ
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:26:22 +0000
Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EGNjY-0007um-N7
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:27:00 +0100
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:26:58 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting
Message-ID: <20050916222658.1af4dbdc@snowdrop.home>
In-Reply-To: <432B373A.8000405@gentoo.org>
References: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com>
	<200509161633.13867.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<20050916214420.25408844@snowdrop.home>
	<200509161659.56603.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<20050916221004.57e1b9f7@snowdrop.home>
	<432B373A.8000405@gentoo.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
 boundary=Signature_Fri__16_Sep_2005_22_26_58_+0100_t4CIwQEj34446MhI;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Archives-Salt: 766428ed-2e38-49eb-acb6-0dd1d4109d45
X-Archives-Hash: 6449620aaa4a5599d516c4422d0af2a7

--Signature_Fri__16_Sep_2005_22_26_58_+0100_t4CIwQEj34446MhI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:20:58 +0200 Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org>
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > There is nothing in this view that says "consulting the package
| > maintainer is not part of the stable decision-making process for
| > arch teams".
|=20
| So do I have to ask the maintainer first everytime I want mark a
| package stable? Is that what you are currently doing?

No. You *can* ask the package maintainer, if you feel that such a move
would be useful and productive.

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


--Signature_Fri__16_Sep_2005_22_26_58_+0100_t4CIwQEj34446MhI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDKzik96zL6DUtXhERArhcAKCk2aKKh5SBgvkT5elTZD/UsYqLvACgy6+b
7h7dUgFcY5YnTvsL3O1wNLA=
=JBHW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature_Fri__16_Sep_2005_22_26_58_+0100_t4CIwQEj34446MhI--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list