From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGMhx-0005Tx-Rc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:21:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8GKF8Od019998; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:15:08 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8GKCKli014312 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:12:21 GMT Received: from d180163.adsl.hansenet.de ([80.171.180.163] helo=iglu.bnet.local) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EGMeG-0006F0-7F for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:17:28 +0000 From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:17:20 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com> <200509161515.26063.vapier@gentoo.org> <20050916203437.33cfb0fa@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20050916203437.33cfb0fa@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2535261.n0ZEZBNjLI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200509162217.26369.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b0ca80e5-ca0a-4b1b-accf-aa85d7bd176c X-Archives-Hash: 40562078398f0580fd5313d9ea575391 --nextPart2535261.n0ZEZBNjLI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 16 September 2005 21:34, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Those should be in package.mask. ~arch is for candidates for arch that > haven't yet proven themselves. No. Your idea how it should work simply doesn't match reality. When you e.g= =2E=20 have upstream devs following the maxim "release early and often", it happen= s=20 that you don't want ebuilds go stable so easily, but still have a wide=20 testing audience. Arch teams have to ask package maintainers when they want= =20 to stabilize an ebuild before it is indicated - be it by a "maint" keyword = or=20 what else. Carsten --nextPart2535261.n0ZEZBNjLI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDKyhWVwbzmvGLSW8RAmh9AJ45U5nX434EIvGpEVrnxYwZvSENHACcDBGK +Bg7LAH38cg4T5Yk6dOdOtA= =I0Mh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2535261.n0ZEZBNjLI-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list