From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGN1a-00007C-Bj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:41:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8GKZlZT009172; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:35:47 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8GKX7Ce021485 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:33:07 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EGMyL-0006he-5F for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:38:14 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EGMyo-0005bU-Vc for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:38:43 +0100 Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:38:38 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Message-ID: <20050916213838.1e7f65d7@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200509162217.26369.carlo@gentoo.org> References: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com> <200509161515.26063.vapier@gentoo.org> <20050916203437.33cfb0fa@snowdrop.home> <200509162217.26369.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Fri__16_Sep_2005_21_38_38_+0100_Q+v2B_.q8a2EDGqV; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 28d7cf9c-4cf6-432d-a2dd-848f0ccd1fbf X-Archives-Hash: 5acfa75302c87792ab60b2952167757a --Signature_Fri__16_Sep_2005_21_38_38_+0100_Q+v2B_.q8a2EDGqV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:17:20 +0200 Carsten Lohrke wrote: | On Friday 16 September 2005 21:34, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > Those should be in package.mask. ~arch is for candidates for arch | > that haven't yet proven themselves. |=20 | No. Your idea how it should work simply doesn't match reality. That's not my idea. That's policy. I just happen to a) have actually read what policy says and b) agree with it. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Fri__16_Sep_2005_21_38_38_+0100_Q+v2B_.q8a2EDGqV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDKy1Q96zL6DUtXhERAqSdAKDhfNkl3kjlOajLlrs1xhdbyggpFgCgqywf xHmcqkHFxUUIkMK7dbeKv90= =f+qd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Fri__16_Sep_2005_21_38_38_+0100_Q+v2B_.q8a2EDGqV-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list