From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGMhQ-0003zz-M9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:20:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8GKEV2b005300; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:14:31 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8GKC7Th017543 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:12:08 GMT Received: from agriffis by smtp.gentoo.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EGMe3-0006BW-9l for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:17:15 +0000 Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:16:22 -0400 X-OfflineIMAP-x783369274-64676f73656e64-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1126901836-0508921074575-v4.0.8 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Message-ID: <20050916201622.GE16616@olive.flatmonk> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com> <200509162048.58261.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20050916200225.7ab159ab@snowdrop.home> <200509161515.26063.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509161515.26063.vapier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Archives-Salt: ff45b9e1-931c-4b29-824f-6cf78c0a7491 X-Archives-Hash: ace6f443265eae68445dbc9b4aad3e1c --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Vapier wrote:[Fri Sep 16 2005, 03:15:26PM EDT] > not really ... sometimes you want to keep a package in unstable > forever (like the cvs snapshots i make of e17), or until you work > some quirks/features out for a new revbump which you would want > stable Why wouldn't you put these in package.mask? Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDKygWJrHF4yAQTrARAuZKAKDLkzJ8Nl5UCTfbYL9+H2GkDntmsQCggtzn ubLpDoKp8sspm3+mRzowRTo= =PRSh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list