From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGLVc-0000dA-LE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:04:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8GIwbAX006616; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:58:37 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8GIuhBD021052 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:56:44 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EGLT4-0000Jf-6K for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:01:50 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EGLTg-0001RF-Lx for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:02:28 +0100 Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:02:25 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Message-ID: <20050916200225.7ab159ab@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200509162048.58261.pauldv@gentoo.org> References: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com> <200509161942.37010.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20050916193804.78cc3627@snowdrop.home> <200509162048.58261.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Fri__16_Sep_2005_20_02_25_+0100_e6.5T96ANkFL/LBY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: ffcf8f23-b8bc-4be7-a7e8-436f45f4c9c6 X-Archives-Hash: bc102f922637b44980b166eb38c15674 --Signature_Fri__16_Sep_2005_20_02_25_+0100_e6.5T96ANkFL/LBY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:48:45 +0200 Paul de Vrieze wrote: | > Take it out of package.mask and leave it for thirty | > (package-dependent) days. If there is a pressing (eg security) | > reason for it to go to stable sooner than would normally be | > expected, file a bug and Cc: the relevant arch teams. |=20 | I was thinking more like signalling that it shouldn't be stable yet, | but shouldn't be masked either. Well, if it's in ~arch it's a candidate to go to stable after further testing. If a package maintainer isn't prepared to have a package moved to stable, they shouldn't take it out of package.mask. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Fri__16_Sep_2005_20_02_25_+0100_e6.5T96ANkFL/LBY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDKxbE96zL6DUtXhERApxMAKCF8hNxyn3agKkdtCtqRmN9GJHt8QCfXouR ZkLEPQa+pI/q/RTB1s6MAOI= =dzvR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Fri__16_Sep_2005_20_02_25_+0100_e6.5T96ANkFL/LBY-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list