From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGOBQ-0005sv-CM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:55:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8GLnjC6031467; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:49:45 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8GLkW7f022895 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:46:32 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGO7R-0000AR-SK for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:51:41 +0000 Received: (qmail 16512 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2005 17:47:41 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 16 Sep 2005 17:47:41 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:51:52 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com> <432B373A.8000405@gentoo.org> <20050916222658.1af4dbdc@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20050916222658.1af4dbdc@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509161751.52295.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 8ab9ebb2-b97f-4de3-bff7-43f7d2ce6c27 X-Archives-Hash: b70dd4284c029decf1b42d43ff268eab On Friday 16 September 2005 05:26 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:20:58 +0200 Simon Stelling > > wrote: > | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | > There is nothing in this view that says "consulting the package > | > maintainer is not part of the stable decision-making process for > | > arch teams". > | > | So do I have to ask the maintainer first everytime I want mark a > | package stable? Is that what you are currently doing? > > No. You *can* ask the package maintainer, if you feel that such a move > would be useful and productive. that's the problem, there's no way to flag which packages should be consulted and which ones are a non-issue -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list