From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGMwe-0007Ca-5n for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:36:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8GKUZt5029072; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:30:35 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8GKRx8f002664 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:27:59 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGMtL-0000DW-VM for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:33:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 11823 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2005 16:29:05 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 16 Sep 2005 16:29:05 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:33:13 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com> <200509161515.26063.vapier@gentoo.org> <20050916203437.33cfb0fa@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20050916203437.33cfb0fa@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509161633.13867.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: c29da4c0-0501-4f4a-aad5-5e06c65d14bf X-Archives-Hash: b4cefc2c298660de7a094f3ad7f8125c On Friday 16 September 2005 03:34 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:15:26 -0400 Mike Frysinger > > wrote: > | not really ... sometimes you want to keep a package in unstable > | forever (like the cvs snapshots i make of e17), or until you work > | some quirks/features out for a new revbump which you would want stable > > Those should be in package.mask. ~arch is for candidates for arch that > haven't yet proven themselves. ok, e17 packages dont count here. however, your hardcore view i still dont buy. how about the baselayout-1.9.x -> baselayout-1.11.x stabilization process ? are you telling me that arch teams should have had the power to move those into stable without talking to the maintainer ? baselayout may be a core package, but if you continue with your hard rule here, then it doesnt matter. -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list