From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EG2Ah-000673-Sv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:25:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8FMJElw001309; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:19:14 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8FMFphD027443 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:15:51 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EG266-0000oo-Gf for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:20:50 +0000 Received: (qmail 14166 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2005 18:17:09 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 15 Sep 2005 18:17:09 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:20:57 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com> <1126819556.25404.2.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> <1126821468.23324.84.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> In-Reply-To: <1126821468.23324.84.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509151820.57057.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 396829f9-e11e-4d67-9c3c-9bd3d5f99c35 X-Archives-Hash: f4fbd14b4c318748f611c283d264d21f On Thursday 15 September 2005 05:57 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 17:25 -0400, Olivier Crete wrote: > > - Does it mean that devs who are not part of the x86 team can't move > > packages from ~x86 to x86 ? > > Correct. They can, however, make previous arrangements with the x86 > arch team to allow them to stabilize their own packages. What this says > is "I acknowledge that anything that I break or that breaks on x86 with > my package, I get to fix and is not the responsibility of the x86 arch > team." The x86 team will keep a list of these developers. This is > similar (or identical) to how other arch teams work. For example, I'm > not a member of the amd64 arch team, but they know I have an amd64 and > use it as my primary development box, so I have made arrangements with > them so I can ~amd64 -> amd64 my own packages. If something breaks, I > pick up the pieces, not them. actually this is came up in the meeting as something we would like to see spelled out explicitly ... either as a GLEP itself or as a policy update to current stabilization practices the GLEP was approved on the grounds that we need an x86 team and that it needs to be treated as any other arch ... arch team interaction with maintainers should be spelled out clearly rather than part of a single sentence '... or make individual arrangements with the x86 arch team.' -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list