From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EFYY2-0000N6-98 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:47:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8EEgGJF004172; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:42:16 GMT Received: from callisto.cs.kun.nl (callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8EEeXRG012004 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:40:34 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by callisto.cs.kun.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5322E80BD for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:45:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug 80905 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:45:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <1126617879.5910.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4326D999.3040509@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4326D999.3040509@gentoo.org> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4628181.Nreh9eEsiA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200509141645.10555.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: a5b1a12d-3d4d-41f5-a32e-8c2ecbcc2abd X-Archives-Hash: 11a099d236fb937b2c34d6a27242cf0b --nextPart4628181.Nreh9eEsiA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 13 September 2005 15:52, Daniel Drake wrote: > Frank Schafer wrote: > > Does someone know if it's worth a try with the vanilla and if vanilla > > here means a really vanilla from kernel.org or if it's sufficient to > > get the (too patched and thus not so vanilla) vanilla-sources. > > vanilla-sources is not patched. > > > Please be kind with me regarding to the fact that I'm posting here. > > On the gentoo mailing list I get only replies like: "You probably > > have faulty memory." If THIS would be the fact the bug would show up > > randomly in different ebuilds or at least at different lines of code. > > Faulty hardware can cause all kinds of unexplainable behaviour. Don't > base your judgement on this. > > One final point, if you are running vesafb-tng and have >=3D1GB RAM then > try turning off vesafb-tng for now. You might also take a look at bug #20600 for an overview of all kinds of=20 ICE errors. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart4628181.Nreh9eEsiA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDKDd2bKx5DBjWFdsRAg2WAKDDf05JnFU7yAlWlGPTfVsivxqNrQCg3xG1 1/PzRNmVFe2anRYf5msuApg= =YgyZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4628181.Nreh9eEsiA-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list