From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EFOak-00016i-0C for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:09:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8E43d9R001370; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:03:39 GMT Received: from ns2.osuosl.org (ns2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.131]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8E3xnHP006804 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:59:50 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ns2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE10112198E for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14425-41 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (71-34-227-171.eugn.qwest.net [71.34.227.171]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B508121986 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:04:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Corey Shields <cshields@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:59:40 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <4325D12A.5050601@gentoo.org> <200509132011.22368.vapier@gentoo.org> <43276D4F.9040508@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43276D4F.9040508@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509132059.41094.cshields@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at osuosl.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 677e9809-9942-435e-b979-5affeabbb314 X-Archives-Hash: 76ff1ef18ebd7fa11ba2f0939dea2b97 On Tuesday 13 September 2005 5:22 pm, Lance Albertson wrote: > I would like there to be a clause that infra has the ability to at least > temporarily revoke access to have the ability to protect our servers if > something came up quickly. I've always made sure any permanent removals > go through devrel first. that's always been policy, but yeah wouldn't hurt to put it in print somewhere.. -C -- Corey Shields Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list