From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EF0Kr-0004qd-CY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:15:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8D2Adgd029590; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:10:39 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8D28s2P008865 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:08:54 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EF0IU-0005Vk-Uy for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:13:23 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EF0J6-0001s7-LD for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 03:14:01 +0100 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 03:13:56 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC Message-ID: <20050913031356.08743da5@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200509122203.31073.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <4325D12A.5050601@gentoo.org> <20050912202527.5095e4b4@snowdrop.home> <200509122203.31073.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Tue__13_Sep_2005_03_13_56_+0100_paDw2d7OTsprrspf; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 0fbcd09b-aab1-4746-8dd7-a4f0c35748c0 X-Archives-Hash: 76db051f732387fd194cb1ba2f91608a --Signature_Tue__13_Sep_2005_03_13_56_+0100_paDw2d7OTsprrspf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:03:31 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: | > Could we get GLEP 31 (Character Sets for Portage Tree Items) added? | > The only issue holding it back is that a few developers have stated | > outright that they refuse to comply with it, and I don't see it as | > fair to make other developers suffer nasty repoman errors because | > of things a select few will end up breaking... |=20 | it was approved once already, just retracted after that fact pending | further developments in terms of application/developer support | (editors not sucking so much for example) ... so does it really need | to be approved again ? What I mean is... Is the council prepared to commit itself to helping with enforcement of the GLEP? Adding repoman enforcement would be trivial, but repoman is circumventable -- the GLEP is withdrawn because several developers have said that they'll do just that anyway. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Tue__13_Sep_2005_03_13_56_+0100_paDw2d7OTsprrspf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDJjXn96zL6DUtXhERArr6AKC+M47fh81Cap+TnZlccSIGoJxcDwCgwd1M 3/+lIxOx2hyVFQZrjDdpUTU= =/oF7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Tue__13_Sep_2005_03_13_56_+0100_paDw2d7OTsprrspf-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list