From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EF0CH-0003LN-Ka for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:06:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8D21Xhh006292; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:01:33 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8D1x4H5008097 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:59:04 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EF08y-0004cK-RV for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:03:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 28108 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2005 22:00:46 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 12 Sep 2005 22:00:46 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:03:31 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <4325D12A.5050601@gentoo.org> <20050912202527.5095e4b4@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20050912202527.5095e4b4@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509122203.31073.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 4bfb704f-af8f-4476-a17b-668ddf787df1 X-Archives-Hash: 164e250bae80a8c53c94d5c6f1955f97 On Monday 12 September 2005 03:25 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:04:10 +0200 Thierry Carrez > | The deadline for agenda item submission is set to tomorrow, Tuesday, > | September 13th, 1900 UTC. To submit an item, you can reply here or > | send an email to council@gentoo.org. > > Could we get GLEP 31 (Character Sets for Portage Tree Items) added? The > only issue holding it back is that a few developers have stated > outright that they refuse to comply with it, and I don't see it as fair > to make other developers suffer nasty repoman errors because of things > a select few will end up breaking... it was approved once already, just retracted after that fact pending further developments in terms of application/developer support (editors not sucking so much for example) ... so does it really need to be approved again ? i'd say the work that needs to be done is documentation on how to make it work ... for example, i use nano and know nothing of unicode, so i really have no clue how to verify my work and even if i could verify it, how to rectify a bum editor -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list