From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EEwQR-0004rU-13 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:05:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8CLxIlq012666; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:59:18 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8CLu2cK028191 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:56:02 GMT Received: from bmb24.med.uth.tmc.edu ([129.106.207.24] helo=localhost) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EEwLl-0000W5-JP for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:00:29 +0000 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:00:29 -0500 From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC Message-ID: <20050912220029.GX9414@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <4325D12A.5050601@gentoo.org> <1126555733.6559.7.camel@localhost> <20050912205326.GW9414@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <1126560585.7339.5.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYYhpFXgKVw71fwr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1126560585.7339.5.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Archives-Salt: 9dfb8aaa-62c2-41ea-b052-bc758437c0f1 X-Archives-Hash: 75411963b6b76a3eda72bd41cd8a390a --mYYhpFXgKVw71fwr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Patrick Lauer wrote: [Mon Sep 12 2005, 04:29:45PM CDT] > > I'm not quite sure what you're adding. GLEP 15 was approved quite some > > time ago. "All" that remains is to finish up the implementation. > or rather move it from gentooexperimental.org to "official" gentoo > infrastructure (?) Ah, I see. To the best of my knowledge that just needs to be worked out w/ the GLEP 15 people and infra. I dropped into -infra and they said that there's space for it, but that bug # 98282 lists a couple of contentious points. (Also, the gentooexperimental scripts "about" page seems to suggest that their framework differs from the "official" version.) > > Huh? Why should Mr_Bones_ need to go around fixing broken encodings? > > He just has to break the legs of the offending devs.... > Would be better if > (1) it wasn't Mr_Bones alone and > (2) there was an agreed on policy so that (if needed) repeat offenders > can be sanctioned > (e.g. by flipping their commit bit) > that of course needs some backing from the general dev population and > devrel, also the policies should be properly defined so that noone can > weasel out by invoking "it's always been like this" Oh, of course. I just don't agree that all GLEPs that involve QA should be put on hold until we improve QA, however. -g2boojum- --=20 Grant Goodyear=09 Gentoo Developer g2boojum@gentoo.org http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 --mYYhpFXgKVw71fwr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDJfp9ptxxUuD2W3YRAg8vAJ0dp7DLZgZYvIcebRcLco1H1aRcmgCfd3Vd l+MpHbDVdugjkZCt+NcEDX8= =o49s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYYhpFXgKVw71fwr-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list