From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EDmZL-0000RW-Qv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:21:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j89HHCTu004844; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 17:17:12 GMT Received: from griffon26.kfk4ever.com (griffon26.demon.nl [82.161.57.89]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j89HFVk3029936 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 17:15:31 GMT Received: by griffon26.kfk4ever.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D2920A12C19; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 19:18:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 19:18:41 +0200 From: Maurice van der Pot To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: Standardizing "arch" keywording across all archs Message-ID: <20050909171840.GR24542@kfk4ever.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20050909031519.GA31111@dst.grantgoodyear.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tV/+6PImfyFtriLg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050909031519.GA31111@dst.grantgoodyear.org> X-PGP-Key: http://www.kfk4ever.com/~griffon26/pubkey.asc X-URL: http://www.kfk4ever.com/ X-Archives-Salt: c43bda25-3118-4f3f-8a03-fd9ec8baabc3 X-Archives-Hash: 7344ba279c7d5985029f4bf592f20485 --tV/+6PImfyFtriLg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:15:19PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: > If > I've misrepresented your views, please do let me know so that I can fix > the GLEP. A few things are a bit unclear to me. Rewording would be enough, it doesn't touch the meaning of the GLEP. What's the definition of a "non-arch dev"? Is it a dev not in an arch team? And the final paragraph: "Ciaranm and weeve have noted that it is occasionally necessary for arch teams to override a package maintainer when it comes to stabling a package. Stuart has asserted that in those cases the arch team should be willing to take on the support burden for that package." Overriding here means stabling before the maintainer does it, not keeping it in unstable while the maintainer wants to mark it stable, right? Regards, Maurice. --=20 Maurice van der Pot Gentoo Linux Developer griffon26@gentoo.org http://www.gentoo.org Creator of BiteMe! griffon26@kfk4ever.com http://www.kfk4ever.com --tV/+6PImfyFtriLg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDIcPwMGnpIbeahxwRAi+fAKCKvdpW4nZVw7nY2eSWCcn0UQQ8ggCbBBBU 1oH3Ms+bFi+/e5lgvrYy2+U= =0tbl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tV/+6PImfyFtriLg-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list