From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECleo-0008Eq-TA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:11:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j86M6Kf0024956; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:06:20 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j86M3aid025444 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:03:36 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EClal-0002n9-JY for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:06:59 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EClcF-000797-UW for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:08:31 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 23:08:29 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep Message-ID: <20050906230829.06f4b367@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <431E0E40.9060704@gentoo.org> References: <20050904143711.GD23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125863332.11366.89.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904210535.24ab8a39@snowdrop.home> <1125865598.11360.122.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904205307.GG23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125869984.11364.143.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050906152209.GA9825@gentoo.org> <1126034976.10430.3.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <431DEF83.6070701@gentoo.org> <20050906204747.60753c4e@snowdrop.home> <1126041584.30327.42.camel@lycan.lan> <20050906223119.06c9b530@snowdrop.home> <431E0E40.9060704@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Tue__6_Sep_2005_23_08_29_+0100_x4Pg=L=UE/=7T8pC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: e613d9f0-85ae-415a-a902-231bf232fb79 X-Archives-Hash: eaa46cf1c624bf435b666724224fccc1 --Signature_Tue__6_Sep_2005_23_08_29_+0100_x4Pg=L=UE/=7T8pC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:46:40 -0400 "Stephen P. Becker" wrote: | This is true, however it requires users to possibly make a gazillion=20 | entries in their /etc/portage/package.unmask if they want to use a | lot of what are considered truly unstable packages. There are dozens of scripts floating around that will automatically create the relevant package.mask and package.keywords entries for a given package and its dependencies. Maybe it would be worth someone cleaning one of them up and sticking it somewhere sensible... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Tue__6_Sep_2005_23_08_29_+0100_x4Pg=L=UE/=7T8pC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDHhNf96zL6DUtXhERAg7HAJ4kbUizogGaIv+oCLsUIFRHG59UOgCfeMPO ckFuzBAiBEK4Qqmhd2Zs1zo= =++lq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Tue__6_Sep_2005_23_08_29_+0100_x4Pg=L=UE/=7T8pC-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list