From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EChYL-0002V5-7s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:48:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j86HiBh4007650; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:44:11 GMT Received: from smtp50.wxs.nl (smtp50.wxs.nl [195.121.6.34]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j86HfvnG027172 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:41:57 GMT Received: from pavlvs2.devrieze.net ([84.87.243.3]) by smtp50.wxs.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j86HjIQh012929 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 19:45:18 +0200 Received: from hex.local.devrieze.net (hex.local.devrieze.net [192.168.1.7]) by pavlvs2.devrieze.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9B01002F for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 19:45:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 19:45:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050904143711.GD23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <20050906152209.GA9825@gentoo.org> <431DCDDF.2070000@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <431DCDDF.2070000@gentoo.org> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1602855.S1QrvksUs5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200509061945.18677.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: a0ce3705-503b-4da3-8a9c-bc9a85d36a89 X-Archives-Hash: da48787665c1dcfa7bda34e886d18f44 --nextPart1602855.S1QrvksUs5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 06 September 2005 19:11, Joshua Baergen wrote: > Sven Vermeulen wrote: > > MAINTENANCE=3D"~x86" # Maintainer uses x86, package not deemed stable > > I would even suggest not indicating maintainer arch at all. If ATs are > going to be responsible for keywording we should blackbox the process to > ward off assumptions and laziness. Whether the maintainer thinks it's > stable or not on x86 should not affect the AMD64 AT, or even the x86 AT > for that matter. > > We could even boil it down to M_STABLE=3D"yes"|"no" at that point > (suggestions for variable name welcome). In this case just adding a new keyword would be easier. It also would mean= =20 that current tools like imlate would be usable without (significant) change. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1602855.S1QrvksUs5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDHdWubKx5DBjWFdsRAmWmAJ4ssNFoXIfMiho/8wy+RkbdL52fKwCg0ul+ 18t+DK6qw61VMlCDI3WHwBE= =jr2d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1602855.S1QrvksUs5-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list