From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECgyH-0000wF-CG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:10:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j86H6SVS021171; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:06:28 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j86H37Pq026830 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:03:07 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1ECgts-0002Oq-PE for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:06:24 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ECgvN-0003qj-N3 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 18:07:57 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 18:07:55 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep Message-ID: <20050906180755.1f1ffa8e@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20050906152209.GA9825@gentoo.org> References: <20050904143711.GD23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125863332.11366.89.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904210535.24ab8a39@snowdrop.home> <1125865598.11360.122.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904205307.GG23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125869984.11364.143.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050906152209.GA9825@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Tue__6_Sep_2005_18_07_55_+0100_llwaOQDvNopc0X_A; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 5042dca7-4945-412e-a9ea-0f6635411de1 X-Archives-Hash: 489bbcd3d54d4f59e31eda8ded267f81 --Signature_Tue__6_Sep_2005_18_07_55_+0100_llwaOQDvNopc0X_A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:22:09 +0200 Sven Vermeulen wrote: | On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 10:39:44PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: | > At the moment, the only way for a package maintainer to mark a | > package stable is to mark it stable on a "real" arch. Creating the | > "maintainer" arch solves this very problem. |=20 | Yes, but please don't call it the "maintainer" arch. This will | confuse our users and it'll be quite difficult to document. The users will never see it. Tell them "it's for developers only". | MAINTENANCE=3D"~x86" # Maintainer uses x86, package not deemed stable Yick. We can't use ekeyword then. | And it keeps backwards compatibility. Sticking extra entries in KEYWORDS is backwards compatible. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Tue__6_Sep_2005_18_07_55_+0100_llwaOQDvNopc0X_A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDHczt96zL6DUtXhERAjtMAKCrEXGqoPP7O/90urxJGIRLJL9xhwCgwDZs 4SwDKBOCpoIevpdSRS/wV/c= =RYXN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Tue__6_Sep_2005_18_07_55_+0100_llwaOQDvNopc0X_A-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list