From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECQbA-0003Pp-Nb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 23:42:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j85Nc8mB002074; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 23:38:08 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j85NaMH9027526 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 23:36:23 GMT Received: from zh034160.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([222.3.34.160] helo=opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1ECQYq-0004lD-EM for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 23:39:36 +0000 Received: by opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 024BD102DC1; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:39:35 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2005.1 profile gives devfs as virtual Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:39:32 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.90 References: <20050904141154.GA7622@sympatico.ca> <200509052025.27868.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <20050905160655.GD7660@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <20050905160655.GD7660@sympatico.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4528036.c4MT0Sr76p"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200509060839.34718.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 4b5ccee8-927e-4e53-a535-783f1c229832 X-Archives-Hash: aae57147c36a359a651c72f2dbebeba7 --nextPart4528036.c4MT0Sr76p Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:06, Philip Webb wrote: > 050905 Jason Stubbs wrote: > > it's possible that unmerging slotted packages of the one key > > may break your system. How's about not warning > > if there's more than one installed cat/pkg (rather than cat/pkg-ver) > > satisfying the profile atom that is being triggered? > > -- patch snipped -- > > I'ld say that the behaviour should be left alone > pending a larger rewrite of Portage's handling of this kind of thing. > Meanwhile, simply amend the warning to read in red letters eg Why? > "WARNING : removing this package may break your system !! > Have you checked that you have a proper alternative installed ?? > If you are not certain what you are doing, please STOP NOW !! > > Do you want to proceed (NO/yes) ? " No. -- Jason Stubbs --nextPart4528036.c4MT0Sr76p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDHNc2xvWNPsk/ZP4RAvVfAJ9JEl+oZalftxH3r/1jjw6HIcuJCwCgi29N kUvwgemY+PK2DBHOHgwF19E= =oz9y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4528036.c4MT0Sr76p-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list