From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECOAk-0003S8-6d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 21:06:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j85L2bOP031573; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 21:02:37 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j85L0o3N019975 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 21:00:50 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1ECO8G-0004Ra-Sv for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 21:04:01 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ECO9m-0001v6-Tk for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 22:05:34 +0100 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 22:05:32 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep Message-ID: <20050905220532.6d09c651@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <1125953576.10663.90.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> References: <20050904143711.GD23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125865598.11360.122.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904215931.53b9db51@snowdrop.home> <200509042009.37676.morfic@gentoo.org> <1125948029.10669.35.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050905203729.01e6b212@snowdrop.home> <1125951397.10663.79.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050905213452.2a88279b@snowdrop.home> <1125953576.10663.90.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_22_05_32_+0100_8riJOwSCBJKPDdIc; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 5aef905d-cc99-40cb-bc85-6954578daf3a X-Archives-Hash: c6ffefe5f9d20970e46a1f8a60d9dfed --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_22_05_32_+0100_8riJOwSCBJKPDdIc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 21:52:56 +0100 Stuart Herbert wrote: | I've put my point across, but you're determined not to address it | directly. I guess there's nothing else to say on this topic. Bah, I'm not changing the subject at all. It's the same issue. Marking something as stable only creates more of a support burden than marking it ~arch if package maintainers are misusing keywords. And if they are, this will give them even more of an incentive to stop. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_22_05_32_+0100_8riJOwSCBJKPDdIc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDHLMe96zL6DUtXhERAttIAJ0QLWqB4iyQ1JASt9X60mwZugtB6wCgoZ3j KQcAExHt1nwq3vJGMluDLl4= =01QP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_22_05_32_+0100_8riJOwSCBJKPDdIc-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list