From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECFNh-0006I6-F4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:43:21 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j85BdU0O024884; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:39:30 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j85BbnMZ012243 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:37:50 GMT Received: from zh034160.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([222.3.34.160] helo=opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1ECFLN-0005cX-FG for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:40:57 +0000 Received: by opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D36B102DC1; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 20:41:56 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 20:41:54 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.90 References: <20050904143711.GD23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <20050904215931.53b9db51@snowdrop.home> <431C2A24.1030704@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <431C2A24.1030704@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5219016.fZLF1KFHNf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200509052041.56433.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: a943543f-f849-48e3-82d8-72797e6cd960 X-Archives-Hash: 502d6a958abf960024a097a111a4cfba --nextPart5219016.fZLF1KFHNf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 05 September 2005 20:21, Simon Stelling wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > If it isn't fit to be marked stable, it shouldn't be out of > > package.mask. ~arch means "candidate for going stable after more > > testing", not "might work". > > It's a bit of both. When you put a package into ~arch, it's in "testing", > so that says it needs further "testing" since there still could be a not > yet discovered bug, right? Testing of the ebuild rather than of the package, though. This is the point= =20 where people sometimes get confused. =2D-=20 Jason Stubbs --nextPart5219016.fZLF1KFHNf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDHC8ExvWNPsk/ZP4RAhxaAKCxJVMVHE+6n+ML3novN2TagIG77QCgukeP YdPn5wi3h8webl3sOLRXGwc= =0RLN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5219016.fZLF1KFHNf-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list