From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECJWZ-0000Sy-Vv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 16:08:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j85G3boF019660; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 16:03:37 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j85FwGSH025207 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:58:16 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1ECJPR-0001P9-Of for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 16:01:25 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ECJQx-0007Tq-PK for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:02:59 +0100 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:02:57 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep Message-ID: <20050905170257.77400810@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <71P0CA.771817131IKR6ME@gentoo.org> References: <20050905002957.6e756db8@snowdrop.home> <71P0CA.771817131IKR6ME@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_17_02_57_+0100_fzSurvqXz4+b=yLY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 77d5cdb0-2bf5-41d8-b61b-0c06e720b4e7 X-Archives-Hash: 393efd063cda3a45a6bce82042f2e20e --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_17_02_57_+0100_fzSurvqXz4+b=yLY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 9:44:41 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn" wrote: | On 5/9/2005 1:29:57, Ciaran McCreesh (ciaranm@gentoo.org) wrote: | > On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 1:12:54 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn" | > | > wrote: | > | 3) All packages need to be assigned an x86 arch team member | > | responsible. | >=20 | > Why? |=20 | Because if only the x86 arch team can mark stuff stable, anything | without representation on the x86 arch team will stay unstable | forever. Maybe rather than one specific arch team member, several | would undertake to manage otherwise unassigned packages. There are currently ~700 packages which are not visible to x86 or ~x86 users. Do these need an x86 arch team member? Is it the aim of the x86 arch team to cover the entire tree, or only things which are useful to x86 users? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_17_02_57_+0100_fzSurvqXz4+b=yLY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDHGwz96zL6DUtXhERAt6iAKCvY1IBsR5U4Docklx7ntpB160HVQCg3rGB y4W3lOnk1Qf6ZjLT1vG6Sx8= =UXTO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_17_02_57_+0100_fzSurvqXz4+b=yLY-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list