From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECJUk-0001Aq-JA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 16:06:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j85G1FKf000845; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 16:01:15 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j85FvFOR020948 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:57:16 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1ECJOT-0007hB-0v for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 16:00:25 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ECJPy-0007TM-BT for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:01:58 +0100 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:01:55 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep Message-ID: <20050905170155.33d7ceee@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20050905102103.GA17734@pohl.domain_not_set.invalid> References: <20050904215931.53b9db51@snowdrop.home> <20050905102103.GA17734@pohl.domain_not_set.invalid> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_17_01_55_+0100_okeP0agWtoFXJnBj; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: a3a91dca-5f96-4977-afbe-82e90267fadc X-Archives-Hash: 3c39d602d496501c81629dd8756a3ae8 --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_17_01_55_+0100_okeP0agWtoFXJnBj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:21:03 +0100 Tom Martin wrote: | Maybe I'm seeing this all wrong, but the fact is, the number of | packages that need x86 arch team lovin' are pretty small, despite the | number of overall keyworded packages being large. I don't think the | x86 arch team needs to be very large: I think ten developers is | plenty. I just don't know what they'd be doing if there were more. Doesn't solve the coordination problem. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_17_01_55_+0100_okeP0agWtoFXJnBj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDHGv196zL6DUtXhERAjptAKCEX6eLwFZ0FOmSUttT/PE2mO2QPwCdHnvz XEQlVSd1Ap16LU38Xb6vZL0= =EuEy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_17_01_55_+0100_okeP0agWtoFXJnBj-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list