From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EC3wj-0005KX-Pn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 23:30:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j84NR3kd017270; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 23:27:03 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j84NPPen021491 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 23:25:25 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EC3uW-0006T3-7P for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 23:28:28 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EC3vz-00062Q-TT for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 00:29:59 +0100 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 00:29:57 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep Message-ID: <20050905002957.6e756db8@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20050904215931.53b9db51@snowdrop.home> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_00_29_57_+0100_WzmlK8LFFGBN_xE6; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 7d117ff1-2409-49fc-b13d-b9d623deca6d X-Archives-Hash: 76bab395e893a75e4c46956d1aba68cc --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_00_29_57_+0100_WzmlK8LFFGBN_xE6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 1:12:54 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn" wrote: | 3) All packages need to be assigned an x86 arch team member | responsible. Why? | 6) I notice the amd64 team requre their arch testers to | take the ebuild quiz; I think this is a bit harsh, as | arch testers are regular users without commit access to | CVS etc. A simpler quiz targetted at ensuring the arch | testers know what is expected of them would lower the | bar and should encourage more users to join in. Using | the ebuild quiz means you get people who quickly become | devs in their own right... The ebuild quiz isn't particularly difficult... If the proposed "write an ebuild for equizapp" question goes through then maybe they could be exempt from that until they need cvs access, but the main ebuild quiz just tests basic understanding. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_00_29_57_+0100_WzmlK8LFFGBN_xE6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDG4N396zL6DUtXhERAr9wAJ43Ue9eOeXy77eMH+Y8SlAJ1O8WBQCgoyLZ xKmyzgodoRBF/kdLu7nj1Vk= =qt/1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_00_29_57_+0100_WzmlK8LFFGBN_xE6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list