From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EC1Zf-0008Bg-RY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 20:58:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j84KsbWR007714; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 20:54:37 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j84KqYGV028069 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 20:52:35 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EC1WZ-0007Sy-J9 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 20:55:35 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EC1Y4-0004og-Dj for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 21:57:08 +0100 Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 21:57:05 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep Message-ID: <20050904215705.1490579e@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <1125864664.11360.107.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> References: <20050904143711.GD23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <20050904194141.4059a55e@snowdrop.home> <20050904191609.GE23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125864664.11360.107.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Sun__4_Sep_2005_21_57_05_+0100_.tYGi8QjkE0CyMzi; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: efd5a815-dd28-4acd-9587-b474310a19ab X-Archives-Hash: 4139894df5779ab493ac10efe5ee9679 --Signature_Sun__4_Sep_2005_21_57_05_+0100_.tYGi8QjkE0CyMzi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 21:11:03 +0100 Stuart Herbert wrote: | Depends on how many refuse I guess ;-) There doesn't seem to be much | sign of any opposition to the concept so far. Yeah, foser's on holiday. Good time to push the GLEP through. | We have an elected council now; if the council approves the plan, and | devs refuse to follow it, the devs should resign or be ejected. | Otherwise, what's the point? :) Good. Does this mean I can start pushing for UTF-8 again? | I'd be more worried about the impact on users. From a user's point of | view, x86 is a fast-moving arch, where you can normally find an up to | date package, and where most of the major packages are actively and | well maintained by the package maintainers. The introduction of the | x86 arch team will, at some point, turn the x86 arch team into a | bottleneck (just like all the other arch teams already are) The only reason certain arch teams are considered a bottleneck is because they do real testing. As opposed to x86 or ppc, where packages which won't even unpack get marked stable... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Sun__4_Sep_2005_21_57_05_+0100_.tYGi8QjkE0CyMzi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDG1+k96zL6DUtXhERAsEtAKCQSUwSYu0bFz69nkglBhRblUyk7gCeNqYA B1LQ8cV/7VzsTEze6YPwpto= =al6N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Sun__4_Sep_2005_21_57_05_+0100_.tYGi8QjkE0CyMzi-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list