From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAv0L-0004Hw-9w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:45:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j81JfmfL017841; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:41:48 GMT Received: from relay-pt1.poste.it (relay-pt1.poste.it [62.241.4.164]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j81JbhGQ012432 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:37:43 GMT Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org (151.44.18.170) by relay-pt1.poste.it (7.2.063) (authenticated as emanuela.zanon@poste.it) id 431736C500000057 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:40:13 +0200 From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] combining x86 and amd64 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:39:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050901171028.GW18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <200509012119.39816@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20050901202817.1586167d@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20050901202817.1586167d@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart13586109.QM3Pj2j0gk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200509012140.13395@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Archives-Salt: 6dc856c7-6ef6-49ae-b9bd-cd435806def5 X-Archives-Hash: 18e962109cccc190466d0a25d6262ffe --nextPart13586109.QM3Pj2j0gk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 01 September 2005 21:28, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | There was one, wasn't it? And I think I answered to that with some > | points. I have explained my reasons for not doing so today. > No, there was an April Fool's joke. Have to look down to the irc logs to find you said you were serious? That's= =20 why I pointed to that. If you weren't, well I'm sorry I pointed to that, please next time be more= =20 explicit with april fools... and now provide me an explaination, a solution= ,=20 or something :) =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM) --nextPart13586109.QM3Pj2j0gk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDF1kde2h1+2mHVWMRAvM/AJ0aG+cSAGJ8qAFQRI4tlf1XT3rsuQCfZydH VKcTYjYcaLV+k4PR0bpUYto= =n7iC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart13586109.QM3Pj2j0gk-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list