From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAuc8-0001Fp-GR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:20:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j81JHGlw029937; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:17:16 GMT Received: from relay-pt1.poste.it (relay-pt1.poste.it [62.241.4.164]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j81JF1ix017581 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:15:02 GMT Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org (151.44.18.170) by relay-pt1.poste.it (7.2.063) (authenticated as emanuela.zanon@poste.it) id 431736C500000022 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:17:31 +0200 From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" <flameeyes@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] combining x86 and amd64 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:17:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050901171028.GW18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <20050901194212.45ae2570@snowdrop.home> <1125601240.11345.19.camel@lycan.lan> In-Reply-To: <1125601240.11345.19.camel@lycan.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2056393.sBKvCTOCVj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200509012117.31759@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Archives-Salt: 4157d7cd-e3c5-41fc-92eb-8434d9206552 X-Archives-Hash: 3ded8889fadba7ad550708fe08927193 --nextPart2056393.sBKvCTOCVj Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 01 September 2005 21:00, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > Possible, but once again, why will a merge give 'better' QA ? Because you start over. You have to DO actually the QA that's missing on x8= 6. That's true but... WHO will do that? The new "merged" arch team... but let my math skills try to solve this a + b =3D c x86 arch team + amd64 arch team =3D combined arch team 0 + b =3D b x86 arch team =3D 0 and this means that AMD64 arch team will have to do QA for x86, too... Yeah "someone will join" ... but I want to have a list of people joining=20 before say that "someone will join"... =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM) --nextPart2056393.sBKvCTOCVj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDF1PLe2h1+2mHVWMRAgHcAJ9pEE38YjFDYWaE7wGbk8soPD9KZACg6j1f ZGKmTwnJ96rhxd4g3nGqUfQ= =yDpG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2056393.sBKvCTOCVj-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list