From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1EAuc8-0001Fp-GR
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:20:44 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j81JHGlw029937;
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:17:16 GMT
Received: from relay-pt1.poste.it (relay-pt1.poste.it [62.241.4.164])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j81JF1ix017581
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:15:02 GMT
Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org (151.44.18.170) by relay-pt1.poste.it (7.2.063) (authenticated as emanuela.zanon@poste.it)
id 431736C500000022 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:17:31 +0200
From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] combining x86 and amd64
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:17:23 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <20050901171028.GW18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <20050901194212.45ae2570@snowdrop.home> <1125601240.11345.19.camel@lycan.lan>
In-Reply-To: <1125601240.11345.19.camel@lycan.lan>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart2056393.sBKvCTOCVj";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200509012117.31759@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 4157d7cd-e3c5-41fc-92eb-8434d9206552
X-Archives-Hash: 3ded8889fadba7ad550708fe08927193
--nextPart2056393.sBKvCTOCVj
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thursday 01 September 2005 21:00, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> Possible, but once again, why will a merge give 'better' QA ?
Because you start over. You have to DO actually the QA that's missing on x8=
6.
That's true but... WHO will do that?
The new "merged" arch team... but let my math skills try to solve this
a + b =3D c
x86 arch team + amd64 arch team =3D combined arch team
0 + b =3D b
x86 arch team =3D 0
and this means that AMD64 arch team will have to do QA for x86, too...
Yeah "someone will join" ... but I want to have a list of people joining=20
before say that "someone will join"...
=2D-=20
Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2
Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
(Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM)
--nextPart2056393.sBKvCTOCVj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDF1PLe2h1+2mHVWMRAgHcAJ9pEE38YjFDYWaE7wGbk8soPD9KZACg6j1f
ZGKmTwnJ96rhxd4g3nGqUfQ=
=yDpG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart2056393.sBKvCTOCVj--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list