From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1EAuXM-0004tJ-Kq
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:15:49 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j81JBmqS001931;
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:11:48 GMT
Received: from relay-pt1.poste.it (relay-pt1.poste.it [62.241.4.164])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j81J6i3Z031065
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:06:44 GMT
Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org (151.44.18.170) by relay-pt1.poste.it (7.2.063) (authenticated as emanuela.zanon@poste.it)
id 431736C500000016 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:09:13 +0200
From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] combining x86 and amd64
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:09:03 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <20050901171028.GW18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <1125599804.15722.18.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> <43174E56.10506@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <43174E56.10506@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1497920.Ic19lNBjco";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200509012109.13231@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 2d2a3abf-6885-45fd-a993-bd6063dd5375
X-Archives-Hash: 5f6231dfbe2de74845bd74e8e3270285
--nextPart1497920.Ic19lNBjco
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thursday 01 September 2005 20:54, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Well, merging the "two" arches will help solve
> this problem.
I read this as "as nobody wants to take care of x86, and we can't blame any=
one=20
because there's no one to blame, let make amd64 arch team the one to blame"=
,=20
as we don't have facts about x86 arch team at all.
=2D-=20
Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2
Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
(Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM)
--nextPart1497920.Ic19lNBjco
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDF1HZe2h1+2mHVWMRAhX7AKDyNGhV52F4HLceIg9z3+0XXZ91rgCeJcOB
syub+wmL6zpjOxEx/viks3o=
=QKZ4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1497920.Ic19lNBjco--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list