From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAuXM-0004tJ-Kq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:15:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j81JBmqS001931; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:11:48 GMT Received: from relay-pt1.poste.it (relay-pt1.poste.it [62.241.4.164]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j81J6i3Z031065 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:06:44 GMT Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org (151.44.18.170) by relay-pt1.poste.it (7.2.063) (authenticated as emanuela.zanon@poste.it) id 431736C500000016 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:09:13 +0200 From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] combining x86 and amd64 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:09:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050901171028.GW18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <1125599804.15722.18.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> <43174E56.10506@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43174E56.10506@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1497920.Ic19lNBjco"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200509012109.13231@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Archives-Salt: 2d2a3abf-6885-45fd-a993-bd6063dd5375 X-Archives-Hash: 5f6231dfbe2de74845bd74e8e3270285 --nextPart1497920.Ic19lNBjco Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 01 September 2005 20:54, Stephen P. Becker wrote: > Well, merging the "two" arches will help solve > this problem. I read this as "as nobody wants to take care of x86, and we can't blame any= one=20 because there's no one to blame, let make amd64 arch team the one to blame"= ,=20 as we don't have facts about x86 arch team at all. =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM) --nextPart1497920.Ic19lNBjco Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDF1HZe2h1+2mHVWMRAhX7AKDyNGhV52F4HLceIg9z3+0XXZ91rgCeJcOB syub+wmL6zpjOxEx/viks3o= =QKZ4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1497920.Ic19lNBjco-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list