From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAuWk-0004XU-QZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:15:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j81JBIDh025156; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:11:18 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j81J6fxJ021761 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:06:41 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EAuQv-0006By-MC for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:09:09 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EAuQu-0002od-J5 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 20:09:08 +0100 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 20:09:06 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] combining x86 and amd64 Message-ID: <20050901200906.67fb309c@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <1125601141.11345.16.camel@lycan.lan> References: <20050901171028.GW18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <200509011923.58239@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20050901184101.5ed8cadc@snowdrop.home> <200509011950.24494@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20050901190259.31d68edd@snowdrop.home> <1125599804.15722.18.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> <1125601141.11345.16.camel@lycan.lan> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Thu__1_Sep_2005_20_09_06_+0100_vBbwCgfRU27arQRf; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: b1debd6a-d5d3-4991-99bd-feb0ac0e669a X-Archives-Hash: b9ef8743a426dfb237ce745b53d47997 --Signature_Thu__1_Sep_2005_20_09_06_+0100_vBbwCgfRU27arQRf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 20:59:01 +0200 Martin Schlemmer <azarah@gentoo.org> wrote: | So to be frank, I propose that either the alt-arch devs start | explaining above instead of half-assed answers and senseless ranting, | or shut up. From the amount of _usefull_ comments they have given, it | does not look like its really an issue or priority for them besides | having some fun. Hence the GLEP proposal. Unfortunately, too many ignorant people are jumping in and spewing out nonsense about things they don't understand before the GLEP's even written... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Thu__1_Sep_2005_20_09_06_+0100_vBbwCgfRU27arQRf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDF1HU96zL6DUtXhERAhdOAKCrTFXaUwcmwnC8HkFVExSSv1h/9QCg05kq KugQKMRHUp8q49wENV31zpg= =m40e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Thu__1_Sep_2005_20_09_06_+0100_vBbwCgfRU27arQRf-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list