From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1EAtBe-00066W-Mj
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:49:19 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j81HjadU027651;
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:45:36 GMT
Received: from relay-pt4.poste.it (relay-pt4.poste.it [62.241.4.118])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j81HgpuN012738
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:42:51 GMT
Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org (151.44.18.170) by relay-pt4.poste.it (7.2.063) (authenticated as emanuela.zanon@poste.it)
id 430B04100002BC39 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:45:20 +0200
From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?iso-8859-1?q?Petten=F2?=" <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] combining x86 and amd64
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:45:10 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <20050901171028.GW18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <200509011923.58239@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <43173CC8.4090606@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <43173CC8.4090606@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart2168613.9t9gNfClYv";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200509011945.20040@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 7b773ecb-7c00-4bb5-bb54-a1bdcf8e4747
X-Archives-Hash: f66ed846c1cfcc4e4cfa7fc41d14d61c
--nextPart2168613.9t9gNfClYv
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thursday 01 September 2005 19:39, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Witih amd64 becoming so widespread, this will change.
You think it's a thing that changes in 2 days?
> Doesn't the amd64 team have a set of 32-bit compat libs just to run
> binary packages? When running 32-bit code, isn't amd64 basically just a
> glorified athlon-xp?
Kernel-level code doesn't work. Some 32-bit binaries fails to work, and the=
=20
emul-libs are NOT a way to say "it's 32-bit"...
There are TOO many differences...
About p.mask.. no I don't like that solution, p.mask is good for a platform=
=20
profile (for example bsd's, darwin's or linux's), but not to arch level, we=
=20
have -* keywords for that, haven't we?
=2D-=20
Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=F2
Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
(Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM)
--nextPart2168613.9t9gNfClYv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDFz4we2h1+2mHVWMRAoPqAJ4iyuBSqEjptLLYz31InnLAn9udQACeNjQc
QHnhc/llmQAZlrKcFYpYqGE=
=kajb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart2168613.9t9gNfClYv--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list