From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAu3e-0004MH-Gp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 18:45:06 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j81If8hE018877; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 18:41:08 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j81IcvVZ024415 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 18:38:58 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EAu05-0000Bh-Vm for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 18:41:26 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EAu04-0002Zu-Ra for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:41:24 +0100 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:41:22 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] combining x86 and amd64 Message-ID: <20050901194122.261fe6d7@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20050901171028.GW18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> References: <20050901171028.GW18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Thu__1_Sep_2005_19_41_22_+0100_LqmYCY08ZdbPHARA; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: cec2b423-00d9-4abd-875e-50b98d15dfcb X-Archives-Hash: d5f5bc8dcdb4388c3f5c3ec12e121ef3 --Signature_Thu__1_Sep_2005_19_41_22_+0100_LqmYCY08ZdbPHARA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:10:28 -0500 Grant Goodyear wrote: | The recent discussion about having a "real" x86 arch team and | combining the x86 and amd64 keywords was both interesting and | provocative. Of course, this is the sort of thing that the GLEP | system was meant for. Now that we have a new council that (I hope) | will be active in approving or rejecting GLEPs, perhaps someone | should be writing a GLEP about combining x86 and amd64? Won't work. Too many people who don't have a clue what's being proposed and who don't understand the explanations. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Thu__1_Sep_2005_19_41_22_+0100_LqmYCY08ZdbPHARA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDF0tU96zL6DUtXhERAlbyAJ9saekqP1H7GmcTubh976WiFhHYJQCfRxel 5ATPxmP+N6wAaTY86EFGkYo= =6uMK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Thu__1_Sep_2005_19_41_22_+0100_LqmYCY08ZdbPHARA-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list