From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAtNm-0005ZV-GR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 18:01:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j81HuZ1t011389; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:56:35 GMT Received: from ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j81HmiCW002614 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:48:44 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc5-cmbg1-5-0-cust40.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([81.103.16.40]:35581 helo=localhost) by ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:465) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1EAtDR-0004nO-T8 (Exim 4.51) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Thu, 01 Sep 2005 18:51:09 +0100 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:02:39 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] combining x86 and amd64 Message-ID: <20050901190239.158db103@localhost> In-Reply-To: <43173D96.9030701@gentoo.org> References: <20050901171028.GW18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <200509011923.58239@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <43173BBD.3020704@gentoo.org> <43173D96.9030701@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: spb42@hermes.cam.ac.uk X-Archives-Salt: 04107130-3f89-420a-9185-d10556120ecf X-Archives-Hash: 739098a7fcca5e3a45be84470295e0b3 On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:42:46 +0200 Simon Stelling wrote: > Also, you can't compare sparc32/sparc64 to x86/amd64: sparc64 is just > a 64bit kernel with a 32bit userland. However, that can't be said of mips, where one keyword covers 32- and 64-bit kernels with three different userland ABIs, each with its own set of new and interesting bugs. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list