From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EADZQ-0008Gr-Nt for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:23:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7ULKEm3014587; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:20:14 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7ULIXgO015413 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:18:34 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EADX9-0007Ia-92 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:20:43 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EADY5-0002OP-Q6 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:21:41 +0100 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:21:39 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles Message-ID: <20050830222139.70f764f4@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <1125436569.3539.48.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> References: <20050825000442.GC1701@nightcrawler> <431036EA.8050401@gentoo.org> <20050827100130.GX1701@nightcrawler> <1125334595.1964.107.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829203259.GA13987@nightcrawler> <1125351816.1964.148.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829231247.104e9ff8@snowdrop.home> <1125404657.1964.167.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <4314715E.5000809@gentoo.org> <4314BA18.8040009@egr.msu.edu> <1125436518.15621.54.camel@darksystem> <20050830214002.1ce72cc2@localhost> <1125434724.3539.42.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> <20050830215649.240a3bc5@snowdrop.home> <1125436569.3539.48.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Tue__30_Aug_2005_22_21_39_+0100_1Sr856VWpa7cn3p/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 6978a03f-204c-49b4-b58b-78311430d9ee X-Archives-Hash: 54b7cd90747da7528a56ff6161e7715e --Signature_Tue__30_Aug_2005_22_21_39_+0100_1Sr856VWpa7cn3p/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:16:09 -0400 Olivier Crete wrote: | On Tue, 2005-30-08 at 21:56 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:45:24 -0400 Olivier Crete | > wrote: | > | And I dont think the QA is worst on x86.. Most herd devs are on | > | x86 and its their responsability to do their QA. | >=20 | > QA needs coordination. Otherwise we end up with repeats of the | > "Gnome not building on stable x86 for several weeks at a time | > because the Gnome and Mozilla herds don't talk to each other" | > fiasco. |=20 | I could not agree more. Do you want to do the coordination ? If someone buys me a fast x86 box that will boot Linux, sure. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Tue__30_Aug_2005_22_21_39_+0100_1Sr856VWpa7cn3p/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDFM3l96zL6DUtXhERArD7AKCSqTelz11YHa0cwdWnl1C2uDt/kwCghXZB UwfXCKUYejRI2wO8G3ISFdc= =Mt8B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Tue__30_Aug_2005_22_21_39_+0100_1Sr856VWpa7cn3p/-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list