From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EADZQ-0008Gr-Nt
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:23:05 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7ULKEm3014587;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:20:14 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7ULIXgO015413
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:18:34 GMT
Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EADX9-0007Ia-92
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:20:43 +0000
Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EADY5-0002OP-Q6
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:21:41 +0100
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:21:39 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles
Message-ID: <20050830222139.70f764f4@snowdrop.home>
In-Reply-To: <1125436569.3539.48.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal>
References: <20050825000442.GC1701@nightcrawler>
	<431036EA.8050401@gentoo.org>
	<20050827100130.GX1701@nightcrawler>
	<1125334595.1964.107.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
	<20050829203259.GA13987@nightcrawler>
	<1125351816.1964.148.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
	<20050829231247.104e9ff8@snowdrop.home>
	<1125404657.1964.167.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
	<4314715E.5000809@gentoo.org>
	<4314BA18.8040009@egr.msu.edu>
	<1125436518.15621.54.camel@darksystem>
	<20050830214002.1ce72cc2@localhost>
	<1125434724.3539.42.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal>
	<20050830215649.240a3bc5@snowdrop.home>
	<1125436569.3539.48.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
 boundary="Signature_Tue__30_Aug_2005_22_21_39_+0100_1Sr856VWpa7cn3p/";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Archives-Salt: 6978a03f-204c-49b4-b58b-78311430d9ee
X-Archives-Hash: 54b7cd90747da7528a56ff6161e7715e

--Signature_Tue__30_Aug_2005_22_21_39_+0100_1Sr856VWpa7cn3p/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:16:09 -0400 Olivier Crete <tester@gentoo.org>
wrote:
| On Tue, 2005-30-08 at 21:56 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:45:24 -0400 Olivier Crete <tester@gentoo.org>
| > wrote:
| > | And I dont think the QA is worst on x86.. Most herd devs are on
| > | x86 and its their responsability to do their QA.
| >=20
| > QA needs coordination. Otherwise we end up with repeats of the
| > "Gnome not building on stable x86 for several weeks at a time
| > because the Gnome and Mozilla herds don't talk to each other"
| > fiasco.
|=20
| I could not agree more. Do you want to do the coordination ?

If someone buys me a fast x86 box that will boot Linux, sure.

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


--Signature_Tue__30_Aug_2005_22_21_39_+0100_1Sr856VWpa7cn3p/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDFM3l96zL6DUtXhERArD7AKCSqTelz11YHa0cwdWnl1C2uDt/kwCghXZB
UwfXCKUYejRI2wO8G3ISFdc=
=Mt8B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature_Tue__30_Aug_2005_22_21_39_+0100_1Sr856VWpa7cn3p/--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list