From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EADBP-0000cY-AE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:58:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7UKtQhN015817; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:55:26 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7UKriFg029230 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:53:44 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EAD96-00035p-Hz for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:55:52 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EADA4-000274-8H for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:56:52 +0100 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:56:49 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles Message-ID: <20050830215649.240a3bc5@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <1125434724.3539.42.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> References: <20050825000442.GC1701@nightcrawler> <431036EA.8050401@gentoo.org> <20050827100130.GX1701@nightcrawler> <1125334595.1964.107.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829203259.GA13987@nightcrawler> <1125351816.1964.148.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829231247.104e9ff8@snowdrop.home> <1125404657.1964.167.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <4314715E.5000809@gentoo.org> <4314BA18.8040009@egr.msu.edu> <1125436518.15621.54.camel@darksystem> <20050830214002.1ce72cc2@localhost> <1125434724.3539.42.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Tue__30_Aug_2005_21_56_49_+0100_2A=wb/NKp1cKnBgH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 153ee452-0c09-43ae-9aaa-3215c4a394f5 X-Archives-Hash: 7da132da1dc62aa8ab483a298079a9ab --Signature_Tue__30_Aug_2005_21_56_49_+0100_2A=wb/NKp1cKnBgH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:45:24 -0400 Olivier Crete wrote: | And I dont think the QA is worst on x86.. Most herd devs are on x86 | and its their responsability to do their QA. QA needs coordination. Otherwise we end up with repeats of the "Gnome not building on stable x86 for several weeks at a time because the Gnome and Mozilla herds don't talk to each other" fiasco. | And x86 has many more packages that any other architecture. Careful with that... The difference is not so big as you might think, and when you consider how many people own, say, sparc and compare it with how many own x86, you might be surprised... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Tue__30_Aug_2005_21_56_49_+0100_2A=wb/NKp1cKnBgH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDFMgT96zL6DUtXhERAu3xAJ9U9BqLoMb52lTVDkM02/cIRVOTOACfTP7o QbBFptSkcRN7oQebGxtXWGc= =NAxR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Tue__30_Aug_2005_21_56_49_+0100_2A=wb/NKp1cKnBgH-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list