From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAClM-00076k-2Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:31:20 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7UKSVJS004067; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:28:31 GMT Received: from ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7UKQR7c004180 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:26:27 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc5-cmbg1-5-0-cust40.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([81.103.16.40]:39009 helo=localhost) by ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:465) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1EACih-0001j8-T6 (Exim 4.51) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:28:35 +0100 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:40:02 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles Message-ID: <20050830214002.1ce72cc2@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1125436518.15621.54.camel@darksystem> References: <20050825000442.GC1701@nightcrawler> <431036EA.8050401@gentoo.org> <20050827100130.GX1701@nightcrawler> <1125334595.1964.107.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829203259.GA13987@nightcrawler> <1125351816.1964.148.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829231247.104e9ff8@snowdrop.home> <1125404657.1964.167.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <4314715E.5000809@gentoo.org> <4314BA18.8040009@egr.msu.edu> <1125436518.15621.54.camel@darksystem> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: spb42@hermes.cam.ac.uk X-Archives-Salt: 8e1f210f-b440-49f1-b2d3-0528f0582734 X-Archives-Hash: bf988ae94372b88d5be322edd40b1d4b On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:15:18 +0000 Luis Medinas wrote: > I belive the worse QA is in x86 and not in AMD64 and MIPS. Between > AMD64 and x86 there's a lot of differences i.e. many packages in the > tree that needs to be patched to work on AMD64 so we cannot cover > AMD64/x86 under the same keyword. There are packages that will work on (for example) little-endian mips but won't work or will need patching to work on big-endian, yet we still cover both of those with one keyword. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list