From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E9rtP-0000PZ-GY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:14:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7TMBVcP019862; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:11:31 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7TM9pUI028808 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:09:51 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1E9rr4-0007Vq-Nt for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:11:50 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1E9rs1-0001Lx-PH for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:12:49 +0100 Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:12:47 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles Message-ID: <20050829231247.104e9ff8@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <1125351816.1964.148.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> References: <20050825000442.GC1701@nightcrawler> <431036EA.8050401@gentoo.org> <20050827100130.GX1701@nightcrawler> <1125334595.1964.107.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829203259.GA13987@nightcrawler> <1125351816.1964.148.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 373da1fe-cdfe-4474-bdca-a539fcc6369f X-Archives-Hash: 982d499898530cbf26f0cba5b1a7a000 On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:43:35 -0400 Chris Gianelloni wrote: | There's nothing stopping you from creating a | default-linux/x86/ferringb profile and doing whatever you wish in it, | but editing default-linux/x86/2005.1 without speaking with releng | would be considered taboo. Shouldn't this fall under the x86 arch team rather than releng? The arch teams maintain the other profiles, and whilst the arch's releng contact will certainly be doing some of the changes, so will other arch team members who do not get deeply involved in the release process... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list