From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E9GF2-0006bD-ER for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 06:02:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7S5xWKr017151; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 05:59:32 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7S5vsps011848 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 05:57:54 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E9GCd-00070X-O1 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 05:59:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 31358 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2005 01:55:25 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 28 Aug 2005 01:55:25 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] autotools support eclass Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 01:59:39 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200508271400.26088@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200508271511.18719.vapier@gentoo.org> <1125171514.10188.52.camel@lycan.lan> In-Reply-To: <1125171514.10188.52.camel@lycan.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508280159.39252.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 9b73964e-0598-4c67-8c22-0da9a9853ad6 X-Archives-Hash: 29e4af6fcf01991132eb44e677abeda3 On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 27 August 2005 02:58 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > Which reminds me .. anybody going to scream if I update elibtoolize() > > > to be able to check if it was already run, and then bug the portage > > > guys to also add it to econf() ? > > > > do what now ? > > Make econf handle elibtoolize the same way it does gnuconfig ... why ? this would help us embedded peeps with uclibctoolize, but other than that ... maybe i just havent really sat down to figure out what elibtoolize does ... -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list