From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8Jla-0003yF-BI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:35:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7PFWYvC022409; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:32:34 GMT Received: from callisto.cs.kun.nl (callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7PFRAC9029195 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:27:11 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by callisto.cs.kun.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F0F2E8244 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:59:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: upgrade's and rc-scripts Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:59:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050720215440.GD13808@exodus> <20050722234054.GA12683@exodus> <1122211520.4621.43.camel@lycan.lan> In-Reply-To: <1122211520.4621.43.camel@lycan.lan> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart14254173.u7zPAxKhDd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200508251359.17881.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5ce0f0b6-1b90-4f8e-8224-71d2653713b0 X-Archives-Hash: c358a7f813bc317bdacd85e22ef48486 --nextPart14254173.u7zPAxKhDd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 24 July 2005 15:25, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 18:40 -0500, Brian D. Harring wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:20:19AM +0200, Sven K=C3=B6hler wrote: > > > Apropos config-files: what about config-files that are provided by > > > the old-version of an ebuild but have been moved or removed by the > > > new version? etc-update doesn't know about them. So /etc/ will be > > > full of useless config-files after some time. > > > > Vapier had suggested yanking (on unmerge, not replacement) any > > config_protected file that has the same md5/mtime as what it was > > originally merged with. > > > > This would cause issues for nvidia-kernel though I'd think, although > > their solution isn't exactly optimal (no better solution atm either > > though). > > Not sure I'm on speed with why that would be bad for nvidia-kernel? If necessary a "touch /etc/myconfigfile" in pkg_postinst would force that=20 the config file stays there. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart14254173.u7zPAxKhDd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDDbKVbKx5DBjWFdsRAi37AJ0R3hlw15kne2kXbSuLdSl5bJaTSgCcDplD 7ZJ5is1XxEauyCWpGzMf1IQ= =Hzum -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart14254173.u7zPAxKhDd-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list