From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E89Pu-000626-Mv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 04:32:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7P4UMLq014385; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 04:30:24 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7P4RkTD029382 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 04:27:46 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E89MF-000765-NB for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 04:28:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 17726 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2005 00:25:44 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2005 00:25:44 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:29:38 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050825000442.GC1701@nightcrawler> <28B2A791-A149-4B58-86D8-8DD349D081E5@gentoo.org> <200508251207.30207.jstubbs@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200508251207.30207.jstubbs@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508250029.38632.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5c4208db-c937-49f0-9091-a0346631345a X-Archives-Hash: a2c18cae5dc5472d3b8c1c2bc2b70d80 On Wednesday 24 August 2005 11:07 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Thursday 25 August 2005 11:30, Kito wrote: > > On Aug 24, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > > > So yeah, subprofiles, reasons why not? > > > > Aside from the work involved, I see no reason to not use the cascades > > for what they seem to be made for. > > Perhaps this is something that should wait for multiple-inheritance... > Along with the work of getting it set up, there's also the inevitable > mistakes that will be made in maintaining it. if we could declare multiple parents, that would make this a lot easier -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list