From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7TLt-00007x-4g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:37:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7N7a89W001526; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:36:08 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7N7YTIZ029050 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:34:29 GMT Received: from cpe-65-26-255-237.wi.res.rr.com ([65.26.255.237] helo=nightcrawler) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1E7TJU-0004gz-G8 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:35:18 +0000 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 02:33:53 -0500 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gstreamer + Use Flags Message-ID: <20050823073352.GG10816@nightcrawler> References: <20050816102714.M81103@xover.htu.tuwien.ac.at> <20050823071939.M41455@xover.htu.tuwien.ac.at> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZcSDOt7TZFizttpn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050823071939.M41455@xover.htu.tuwien.ac.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 676de134-e7a3-45ce-9081-58141c88e19a X-Archives-Hash: cf62612c2efa178c1239d10e236aa53e --ZcSDOt7TZFizttpn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:21:50AM +0200, Fabian Zeindl wrote: > Since nobody except Diego replied on my mail a week ago:=20 > Is there another way besides filing bugs and mailing the list to make a > proposal which gets investigated? I think many users are concerned about = that > gstreamer "oddness", and I didn't find one good reason while reading thro= ugh > bugzilla of not doing this the way I proposed. As stated in 100872, any solution involving centralizing the use flags=20 on gstreamer requires use deps. Can't centralize the use flags on gstreamer till they're available,=20 without doing something QA has every right to wedgie you for=20 (build_with_use die's in pkg_setup). ~harring --ZcSDOt7TZFizttpn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDCtFgvdBxRoA3VU0RAnrUAJ9kC1wUhkQ09Pnv3rQgCttCgev4QQCglLB4 uEAj8WtvTAz3bED21UMHPRY= =Ule0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZcSDOt7TZFizttpn-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list