From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7J05-0002Ux-LL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:34:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7MKWXrF009286; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:32:33 GMT Received: from ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7MKTfNS004293 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:29:41 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc5-cmbg1-5-0-cust40.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([81.103.16.40]:53205 helo=localhost) by ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:465) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1E7Iw3-0004S0-VS (Exim 4.51) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:30:23 +0100 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:41:35 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC - Gentoo on the Lab Message-ID: <20050822214135.6b916221@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1124732954.6502.61.camel@localhost> References: <20050822025840.6bb9bdb9@acme.rjlouro.org> <20050822163811.3dcc8fde@andy.genone.homeip.net> <1124732954.6502.61.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: spb42@hermes.cam.ac.uk X-Archives-Salt: 2d6f2b07-46a3-4125-84ce-20d792785cce X-Archives-Hash: 043057daf3730e6b5b7c74e43ec64c2d On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:49:14 -0400 Kristian Benoit wrote: > I do agree with that, portage probably need a rewrite/better > modularization anyway. There is/was a project called portage-ng () you > might want to have a look at. I did a little in that direction > recently, and it seems that there is not too many people working on > it since drobbins left, but you can contact Pieter > (pvdabeel@gentoo.org). I might get on that too at some point in the > future too. portage-ng is dead. There is a rewrite going on, but it'll take a while to get anywhere near usable. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list