From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E5z2X-00042Z-2P for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 05:03:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7J52hq8020870; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 05:02:43 GMT Received: from tiger.gg3.net (m006052.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [219.121.6.52]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7J50wvL023671 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 05:00:59 GMT Received: (qmail 769 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2005 05:01:03 -0000 Received: from lion.gg3.net (HELO lion) (10.0.0.2) by 0 with SMTP; 19 Aug 2005 05:01:03 -0000 Received: by lion (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:01:03 +0900 Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:01:03 +0900 From: Georgi Georgiev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild design issue regarding some {I need the lib and api only}-DEPENDs Message-ID: <20050819050102.GA8591@lion.gg3.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200508181628.44059.trapni@gentoo.org> <20050818170128.GA487528@lion.gg3.net> <200508190259.51046.luke-jr@utopios.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200508190259.51046.luke-jr@utopios.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: db91853d-00c1-42ad-a2a6-e0b11103459f X-Archives-Hash: d294aa2f16d35fb90ab8b051e998d660 --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline maillog: 19/08/2005-02:59:46(+0000): Luke-Jr types > On Thursday 18 August 2005 17:01, Georgi Georgiev wrote: > > vanilla - Do not add extra patches which change default behaviour > > For features, I would expect individual USE flags-- what if I want one patch, > but not another? I agree. Fine-grained control is nice, but I also like the idea of being able to refuse all non-upstream patches that change default behaviour. Similarly to what mutt is doing: !vanilla? ( nntp? ( .... ) some other patches that have no useflag ) > For changing mere defaults, a "gentoo" USE flag seems like it would make > sense. -- \ Georgi Georgiev \ Alcoholics Anonymous is when you get to \ / chutz@gg3.net / drink under someone else's name. / \ +81(90)2877-8845 \ \ --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDBWeOfXO2NUT1EmYRAlqFAKDsDDSY+gpxYVX5JWLvGA0Y2BdjsACgum7s Tn97RqhSQxGUfGpqCUG9LvQ= =0lGg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list